Slip distribution for different smoothing factors: (a) κ = 0 . 10, (b)

Download scientific diagram | Slip distribution for different smoothing factors: (a) κ = 0 . 10, (b) κ = 0 . 18, (c) κ = 0 . 30. We pick the second as the resultant model because of its good compatibility between weighted mis fi t and solution roughness. The numbers between the triangles in (a) indicate the segments. The white star denotes the epicenter from Harvard CMT solution.  from publication: 3-D coseismic displacement field of the 2005 Kashmir earthquake inferred from satellite radar imagery | Imagery, Imagery (Psychotherapy) and Earthquake | ResearchGate, the professional network for scientists.

TC - Compensating errors in inversions for subglacial bed roughness: same steady state, different dynamic response

Slip distribution for different smoothing factors: (a) κ = 0 . 10, (b)

Remote Sensing, Free Full-Text

Remote Sensing, Free Full-Text

NHESS - Testing machine learning models for heuristic building damage assessment applied to the Italian Database of Observed Damage (DaDO)

Slip distribution for different smoothing factors: (a) κ = 0 . 10, (b)

Continuous estimation of coseismic and early postseismic slip phenomena via the GNSS carrier phase to fault slip approach: a case study of the 2011 Tohoku-Oki sequence

Atmosphere, Free Full-Text

Remote Sensing, Free Full-Text

NHESS - Geologic and geodetic constraints on the magnitude and frequency of earthquakes along Malawi's active faults: the Malawi Seismogenic Source Model (MSSM)

Smoothing Control Slip Tights – Lxve

Bali Comfort Revolution Easy Lite Smoothing Slip Short DFS060

80s Olga Bodysilk Slip Vintage Two Tone Beige Fitted Slip Sleek

Brilliance by Vanity Fair Women's Invisible Edge Smoothing Full Slip 10345, Black, Small

As Is Anti x Proof Smoothing Slip